I’m still figuring out my JD system, but after purchasing the quickstart package, I’m sure something wonderful will happen. So, I highly recommend it.
Let’s get to it. I’m an Evernote user. My JD system will probably be transferred to a cloud with the classic folders. However, I don’t understand why not use JD with a powerful system like Bear or Evernote also as a real archive. We would have a fast tool, powerful search, and the ability to search even for content present in photos and PDFs, for example. So, I don’t understand why the ID should be a note and not a tag. Let me explain better. In Bear, for example, we should have a structure with the following tags:
tag 1 10-19 Personal
tag 2 ├── 11 Document Management
Note bear
11.10 "Education"
In the note 11.10 “Education,” I would insert (if I understood correctly) where my files are archived and useful information on how to use the ID. Which is fine. But I wonder why the tags, for example in Bear, couldn’t be used to replicate exactly the folder structure I have on the cloud to also archive documents in Bear or Evernote. For example:
tag1 10-19 Personal
tag2 ├── 11 Document Management
tag3 └── 11.10 "Education"
In this way, I could create a note, for example, 11.10 Education - Index, which I would continue to use as an index, but I could create other notes to attach my files, such as 11.10 Education - Diploma, 11.10 Education - Degree, or even link all the attachments related to the same topic within the same note. So, what would be the downside of making the JD ID an additional tag (like a folder) to include everything related to that category? Thanks.