Life admin "11.02 System manual 📙"

Life Admin System
1

Hi @johnnydecimal

In the Life admin pack 11.02 is for ‘System manual :orange_book:’.
As I see 12.03-the-standard-zeros, there is a kind of conflict for those who want to use it for ‘Work in progress’ ID.

What do you think ?
Do we move the 11.02 System manual to an other ID ?

2

Proposition #1: create the area 00-09 :

image
image1032×886 79.9 KB

Move 11.02 System manual to 00.00 Index

Proposition #2 move in an other Life admin ID

Move 11.02 System manual to 00.00 Index to 11.34 Habits, routines, & planning

3

Hmmm interesting. For me, I feel like habits, routines and planning would be ongoing, the system manual isn’t an index. It would make sense to me for me to have it in 00-10 somewhere, with other JD manuals and possibly GTD. Together. I don’t know what the best name would be, maybe system manualS.

4

Or, I would probably put the system manual with all of my other PKM courses/workshops.

1 Like
5

While we used AC.01 and AC.09 in the system, you’ll notice we made no mention of ‘the standard zeros’ anywhere.

This was deliberate. The assumed audience for QS:LA is a beginner, and the concept can be confusing. Heck, it still confuses me sometimes.

I’d put this either at 00.00 or just give it a regular ID in that category, 00.11 System manual.

1 Like
6

Thank you for your enlightening answers.

As I am in the process of migrating my structure to QS:LA, I would really like to release ID 11.02 for the WIP.

At the same time, if I create an area 00-09 just to store JD manuals, this will increase the number of areas and clutter up the overall system for no good reason. I fully understand why this subject isn’t addressed in QS:LA (and why it shouldn’t be).

I’ll find a place for it elsewhere, like 11.34 or 11.83 and restore 11.02 Work in progress

1 Like
7

Actually, what am I talking about? I told you it was confusing! :rofl:

Category 10 Life admin area management is what this is for! Not a new area. :man_facepalming:

The manual doesn’t relate to your whole system. It relates to this area. So 10.00 or an ID from 10.11 would be a good place and only requires the creation of one otherwise-unused category.

1 Like
8

Yes I understand and of course it’s far more logical :sweat_smile:

For the moment like @Jayde20, I prefer to host the index in the structure and saving a category and AC.ID folders for a single subject.

To see over time how it is managed in use

1 Like