I have some IDs that I would like to use Bear notes as my writing platform.
For example let’s say I have an ID for my companies sales process.
In my opinion, that is one thing → one ID.
Let’s say it has 4 subtitles. I don’t want the parent note to be too long so I would like to split that note in to 4 different notes.
Question is, can I have multiple notes in my Bear app with the same AC.ID? That would feel weird.
If the structure was with word documents, it would look like this:
11.11 Sales Process
Prospecting.doc
Sales Call.doc
Closing.doc
On-boarding.doc
Seems that I forgot the .doc also for the Bear example, that made it confusing.
My problem is that I would like to have notes written with Bear. If those notes are based around the same subject (let’s say repainting the kitchen), than they will have the same AC.ID and my Bear will have multiple notes with same AC.ID.
For example I could have these:
11.11 Repainting the kitchen (parent)
11.11 Color options for kitchen (subnote)
11.11 People to ask to help(subnote)
11.11 Notes about where things were (subnote)
Should I just have those notes be their own AC.ID? On my cases my notes are so long that it feels wrong to keep them in one note. And I don’t want to use Word for this, Bear feels so much better to write in.
I am deciding how to organize my weekly plans and came across this thread.
My requirements:
Use one ID to store them all.
Write them in my notes app (Bear).
Like @arttuhann said, if the structure was with Word documents this can be easily done on the file system. However, I want to use Bear and don’t see a way to do this without one long file with different headings. This is not the end of the world, but something tells me I could be doing this a better way.
If they’re weekly plans I’d probably go with this. Assuming your ID is 11.11 Weekly plans.
11.11 2024-07-25 Weekly plan 11.11 2024-08-01 Weekly plan
…and so on. Then they’ll sort nicely.
Or, if you’re using Bear, they’ve improved how you can fold headers recently. So you could have a header per week, and just fold it when it gets old. Newer weeks at the top.
But I can see how one eventually-massive note feels a bit untidy.
This could then mean that each application on an iOS device is welcome to have its own JD ID if it solves a problem, with some kind of iFuse-JD-ID sync layer, and can then be subject to the parent file-system’s backup strategy from there.