A short video showing how I used to use Outlook to tame my inbox. Bad news though: these advanced features are probably going away.
This has been a Johnny.Decimal blog post notification; see jdcm.al/21.05
A short video showing how I used to use Outlook to tame my inbox. Bad news though: these advanced features are probably going away.
This has been a Johnny.Decimal blog post notification; see jdcm.al/21.05
Outlook has gone from one extreme to the other. The āoldā Outlook was fussy, confusing and ugly. The new Outlook is basically useless.
Hopefully, they make āGoldilocks Outlookā at some point in the future.
I think I donāt get quite that many emails but I have a different automation approach that works extremely well for me. I should post a thorough write-up of it, but hereās the gist of it:
Boom! Nine steps to efficient emails.
Hi Johnny, thanks for this and the rest of your work. A question on this post: to what extent can your approach be replicated in Apple Mail? (Have you tried?)
Not at all, alas. It was only Outlook in its previous version that had such powerful features.
Or ā¦ sorry, not necessarily true. Thereās nothing stopping you from creating folders and using mail rules to filter things in there. But itāll be a sad copy of what I show in the video.
I dare say there are other mail apps that allow you to filter that are more powerful than Mail.app.
It feels like the days of āmanaging your emailā are over. Just let the AI sort it out for you!
And on that note, Recall in Windows 11 may do the same for everything else that one does on a computer, tooā¦ If you can stomach the privacy concerns, anyway. I wonder if humanity will just give up on organizing information manually in the future.
I think that would be sad. Organizing information helps me see who I am at a specific timepoint, and helps me clarify whatās important to me. It would be a loss for humanity if fewer people discovered that significance for themselves.
Something about which I think deeply, given that itās how I pay the rent.
Eventually, as in on an infinite timescale, yeah. We should get to the point where information can just be called up at-will. You donāt see Jean-Luc Picard clicking through folders to find his Word document.
But this round of AI isnāt close to that. LLMs donāt even try to solve this problem, although Iām sure some other AI startup with some other technology is.
Iām still not worried. Like @clappingcactus says, some of us want to organise our own information. It gives us ā¦ something, some sense of self, of comfort ā¦ which is different depending on who you are.
And, today, right now, most people donāt bother. 90%? 99%? Itās high. Most people just let the chaos reign. See: any workplace.
The 1% are here, or over at PARA or Zettelkasten or tagging with Karl Voit or whatever they enjoy. And I think that this 1% will want to organise their own stuff for some time to come.
(A bit random for my first post, but I couldnāt resist jumping into this threadā¦)
Maybe we will eventually co-evolve with computer code, and actually function optimally as a symbiotic system and feel great, but it seems that for now, the accepted wisdom is that humans have a certain psychological makeup which requires a bit of friction and effort in any achievements in order to have a truly satisfying sense of self.
Or maybe itās not the friction and effort, but the fact that we have an over-large visual cortex (insert some citations about how much percentage of neurons are related to visual processing, or about how the neuronal activity of imagining is indistinguishable from actually seeing something). Thus, we need to have some kind of visual/spatial map of knowledge, otherwise we canāt really grasp it. So I suspect Picard still has some kind of graphical file manager metaphor on his tablet. Three centuries isnāt enough time for evolution to replace spatial cognition with some alternative (some kind of electromagnetic sensing of where on a storage medium a particular file is??)
Back on the original topic, Iām working on setting up notmuch (command-line email indexing) as part of my new JD system. Itās a full-text indexing and tagging system for mail, so constructing your own āviewsā of your email is a first-class behaviour. So first-class, in fact, that you kinda have to make your own inbox if you want it by creating up a rule to tag newly indexed email with the tag āinboxā. By extension, you can dispense with the classic inbox entirely and move stuff straight to your working folders (which are just tags). So I think it is perfectly suited for the approach outlined in the video. Iāll report back when Iāve got it set up ā¦
Referencing my comments about visual thinking, Iām a command-line geek but mainly out of ideological necessity. I have come to believe that GUIās are better interfaces because we humans are visual thinkers (all of us, not just the so-called right-brain visual thinkers ā for us, even more so). I use programs like notmuch because I care about privacy and freedom and using hardware as long as possible, and because their features arenāt going to go away because of corporations chasing revenue or buzzwords, and because developing CLI apps is faster and easier than GUI apps. But if there were graphical applications that didnāt violate those other important principles, I would certainly prefer them.