Yes - this is nub of the matter, perhaps:
- case A: JD as a taxonomy, with policies and stuff on the AC. level, with files on disk using the id level
- case B: JD as taxonomy, the file on disk, + a corresponding entry in the index with the metadata of the file (including the location(s).
- case C: library index would apply a taxonomy to a list items with their metadata including search terms and even a table of contents of the item-
But why is it wrong to use JD Index as an index?
File filed AND note created with meta-data in the index? - #5 by Myles - written after re-reading part of the ‘manual’ and having an aha moment.