# Using JD for Junk organisation **URL:** \ **Category:** Concepts\ **Created:** [June 14, 2024, 9:31am UTC](https://forum.johnnydecimal.com/t/using-jd-for-junk-organisation/1576 "2024-06-14T09:31:51Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![johnnydecimal](https://forum.johnnydecimal.com/user_avatar/forum.johnnydecimal.com/johnnydecimal/32/1759_2.png) [@johnnydecimal](https://forum.johnnydecimal.com/u/johnnydecimal)\ **Post date:** [June 15, 2024, 2:20am UTC](https://forum.johnnydecimal.com/t/using-jd-for-junk-organisation/1576/2 "2024-06-15T02:20:19Z")
Similar thread here. Have a flick through that and let us know if it answers your question. > [@Active vs inactive vs archives](https://forum.johnnydecimal.com/t/active-vs-inactive-vs-archives/1561/3): > > You probably shouldn’t bring everything over – or, at least, you shouldn’t worry about every thing you bring over being perfectly neatly organised in the new place. It usually isn’t worth the effort. We’re just chatting about [the ’standard zeros’](https://forum.johnnydecimal.com/t/the-standard-zeros/1558) in another thread. A recent development. One of them is AC.09 Archive. So for every category, assign ID .09 to be archive. Now you’ve got this nice middle ground: your stuff isn’t just lost, outside your system. Nor do you have to worry about exactl… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.johnnydecimal.com/t/using-jd-for-junk-organisation/1576)._